📰 Full Story
Apple and Meta have publicly opposed Canada’s proposed Bill C-22, saying the legislation as drafted could force technology firms to weaken or circumvent end-to-end encryption and insert backdoors into devices and services.
The bill, tabled by the governing Liberal Party and currently debated in the House of Commons after the party won a parliamentary majority, is intended by Canadian law enforcement to speed investigations of security threats.
Apple said the law could undermine its ability to offer strong privacy and security features and that it would never deliberately introduce systemic vulnerabilities.
Meta warned in prepared testimony that the bill’s “sweeping powers, minimal oversight, and lack of clear safeguards” might compel providers to build capabilities that break or circumvent zero-knowledge architectures or install government spyware.
The debate follows a similar UK data access request that prompted Apple to withdraw an advanced iCloud encryption feature last year; Canadian officials say the law would not require changes that create systemic vulnerabilities.
The dispute highlights tensions between public-safety demands and technology companies’ efforts to protect user data.







💬 Commentary