📰 Full Story
A paper published in the Milbank Quarterly on Feb. 3 by researchers at Harvard, Duke and the University of Michigan argues ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are engineered more like cigarettes than whole foods and should face tobacco-style regulation.
The authors say many UPFs — including soft drinks, packaged snacks, ready meals, breakfast cereals and some baby foods — are industrially formulated to maximise hedonic impact and drive compulsive consumption, contributing to obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other preventable conditions.
They call for measures such as clearer labelling and health warnings, taxes on nutrient-poor UPFs, restrictions on marketing to children and limits on availability in schools and hospitals, and say litigation and structural interventions offer a roadmap.
The paper cites data showing UPFs make up more than half of daily calories in the US and large shares of adolescent diets in the UK and other countries, and refers to recent UNICEF and Lancet findings on child UPF consumption.
Some experts caution the study may overreach by equating UPFs with pharmacologically addictive substances and say more evidence is needed to define regulatory responses.
🔗 Based On
Euronews | Latest breaking news available as free video on demandShould ultra-processed food be regulated like tobacco? Study says yes





















💬 Commentary