📰 Full Story
WASHINGTON — A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on April 24 ruled that President Donald Trump’s January 20, 2025 executive order suspending asylum access at the southern border is unlawful, blocking key parts of the administration’s removal procedures.
Judge J. Michelle Childs wrote for the majority, finding that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not permit the president to override statutory removal and asylum-adjudication safeguards or bar people physically present in the United States from applying for asylum.
The panel affirmed a lower-court ruling by Judge Randolph Moss and held that Department of Homeland Security guidance enabling summary “direct repatriation” or expedited removals exceeded executive authority.
Judge Justin Walker issued a partial dissent; Judge Cornelia Pillard joined the majority.
The administration said it strongly disagrees and may seek rehearing en banc or appeal to the Supreme Court.
Civil-rights groups including the ACLU and Las Americas welcomed the decision as protecting asylum seekers’ rights.
The ruling restores access to asylum procedures for migrants already inside the U.S. while leaving presidential authority over entry at ports of entry intact pending further review.







💬 Commentary